ATCL vs CAIQ

REX Autocallable Income ETF against Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
9 bp
ATCL is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
CAIQ
$286M

Side by side

ATCLCAIQ
FundREX Autocallable Income ETFCalamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF
IssuerREX SharesCalamos
CategoryPut Write & Other IncomePut Write & Other Income
Expense ratio0.65%0.74%
Assets$37M$286M
Average daily dollar volume$841K$6.6M
ListedFeb 17, 2026Nov 19, 2025
FrenzyCap score3547
1-month return−0.8%−4.8%
3-month return−0.9%−1.8%
Year to date—−2.1%
1-year return——
30-day volatility10.0%15.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.1%−11.9%
Trailing 12-month yield9.27%15.18%
Holdings53
Top 10 weight100.0%99.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$28M thru Jun 2026+$131M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of ATCL · 0% of CAIQ

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · ATCL holdings · CAIQ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.