BALT vs NAUG

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF against Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - August: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
10 bp
BALT is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.9 pts
NAUG is ahead
Larger fund
BALT
$3.3B

Side by side

BALTNAUG
FundInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - August
IssuerInnovatorInnovator
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.69%0.79%
Assets$3.3B$63M
Average daily dollar volume$25M$274K
ListedJun 30, 2021Jul 31, 2024
FrenzyCap score6324
1-month return−0.8%−6.5%
3-month return+0.3%−3.8%
Year to date+3.8%+6.3%
1-year return+5.5%+7.3%
30-day volatility4.1%15.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−7.8%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings66
Top 10 weight100.7%104.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$317M thru Jul 2026−$43M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility14.6%—
Holdings as ofas of Nov 6, 2026issuer dataas of Nov 6, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BALT holdings · NAUG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.