BALT vs NOCT

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF against Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF- October: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
10 bp
BALT is cheaper
1-year return gap
5.1 pts
NOCT is ahead
Larger fund
BALT
$3.2B

Side by side

BALTNOCT
FundInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF- October
IssuerInnovatorInnovator
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.69%0.79%
Assets$3.2B$319M
Average daily dollar volume$23M$5.3M
ListedJun 30, 2021Sep 30, 2019
FrenzyCap score6240
1-month return+0.3%−0.5%
3-month return+2.4%+3.2%
Year to date+4.7%+10.5%
1-year return+6.7%+11.7%
30-day volatility3.1%7.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−5.8%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings66
Top 10 weight102.2%105.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$317M thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility15.5%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BALT holdings · NOCT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.