BALT vs PSCW

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF against Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
20 bp
PSCW is cheaper
1-year return gap
6.1 pts
PSCW is ahead
Larger fund
BALT
$3.2B

Side by side

BALTPSCW
FundInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFPacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF
IssuerInnovatorPacer
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.69%0.49%
Assets$3.2B$60M
Average daily dollar volume$23M$7K
ListedJun 30, 2021Mar 31, 2021
FrenzyCap score6236
1-month return+0.3%+0.4%
3-month return+2.4%+2.8%
Year to date+4.7%+10.6%
1-year return+6.7%+12.7%
30-day volatility3.1%2.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−1.5%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings65
Top 10 weight102.2%108.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$317M thru Jul 2026−$1.5M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility15.5%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BALT holdings · PSCW holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.