BALT vs QBUF

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF against Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF Quarterly: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
10 bp
BALT is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.4 pts
BALT is ahead
Larger fund
BALT
$3.2B

Side by side

BALTQBUF
FundInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFInnovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF Quarterly
IssuerInnovatorInnovator
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.69%0.79%
Assets$3.2B$201M
Average daily dollar volume$23M$1.7M
ListedJun 30, 2021Jun 28, 2024
FrenzyCap score6234
1-month return+0.3%−1.7%
3-month return+2.4%+2.1%
Year to date+4.7%+4.8%
1-year return+6.7%+6.3%
30-day volatility3.1%7.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−4.0%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings66
Top 10 weight102.2%102.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$317M thru Jul 2026+$6.0M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility15.5%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BALT holdings · QBUF holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.