BALT vs QJUN

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF against FT Vest Growth-100 Buffer ETF - June: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
21 bp
BALT is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.5 pts
QJUN is ahead
Larger fund
BALT
$3.2B

Side by side

BALTQJUN
FundInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFFT Vest Growth-100 Buffer ETF - June
IssuerInnovatorFT Vest
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.69%0.90%
Assets$3.2B$731M
Average daily dollar volume$23M$892K
ListedJun 30, 2021Jun 18, 2021
FrenzyCap score6224
1-month return+0.3%−1.9%
3-month return+2.4%+4.3%
Year to date+4.7%+6.3%
1-year return+6.7%+8.2%
30-day volatility3.1%12.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−6.7%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings65
Top 10 weight102.2%103.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$317M thru Jul 2026+$14M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility15.5%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BALT holdings · QJUN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.