BALT vs QMFE

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF against FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
21 bp
BALT is cheaper
1-year return gap
8.6 pts
QMFE is ahead
Larger fund
BALT
$3.0B

Side by side

BALTQMFE
FundInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February
IssuerInnovatorFT Vest
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.69%0.90%
Assets$3.0B$50M
Average daily dollar volume$21M$209K
ListedJun 30, 2021Feb 20, 2025
FrenzyCap score628
1-month return+1.2%+2.0%
3-month return+2.1%+3.9%
Year to date+4.7%+12.8%
1-year return+6.8%+15.4%
30-day volatility3.0%3.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−4.8%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings517
Top 10 weight101.3%114.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$317M thru Jul 2026+$8.8M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility14.6%—
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BALT holdings · QMFE holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.