BALT vs TJUN

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF against FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
26 bp
BALT is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.3 pts
BALT is ahead
Larger fund
BALT
$3.0B

Side by side

BALTTJUN
FundInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June
IssuerInnovatorFT Vest
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.69%0.95%
Assets$3.0B$2.4M
Average daily dollar volume$21M$101K
ListedJun 30, 2021Jun 18, 2025
FrenzyCap score621
1-month return+1.2%−0.4%
3-month return+2.1%+3.9%
Year to date+4.7%+2.5%
1-year return+6.8%+4.4%
30-day volatility3.0%14.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−9.8%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings59
Top 10 weight101.3%124.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$317M thru Jul 2026$0 thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility14.6%—
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BALT holdings · TJUN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.