BALT vs TRIO

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF against MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
1 bp
BALT is cheaper
1-year return gap
5.8 pts
BALT is ahead
Larger fund
BALT
$3.2B

Side by side

BALTTRIO
FundInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFMC Trio Equity Buffered ETF
IssuerInnovatorMC
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.69%0.70%
Assets$3.2B$120M
Average daily dollar volume$23M$102K
ListedJun 30, 2021Mar 5, 2025
FrenzyCap score6229
1-month return+0.3%−0.2%
3-month return+2.4%+2.6%
Year to date+4.7%+8.3%
1-year return+6.7%+0.9%
30-day volatility3.1%5.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−11.1%
Trailing 12-month yield—8.32%
Holdings613
Top 10 weight102.2%103.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$317M thru Jul 2026+$643K thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility15.5%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BALT holdings · TRIO holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.