BAMA vs MPRO

Brookstone Active ETF against Monarch ProCap Index ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
3.0 pts
BAMA is ahead
Larger fund
MPRO
$256M

Side by side

BAMAMPRO
FundBrookstone Active ETFMonarch ProCap Index ETF
IssuerBrookstoneMonarch
CategoryUS Equity (Other)US Equity (Other)
Expense ratio—1.03%
Assets—$256M
Average daily dollar volume$165K$583K
ListedSep 27, 2023Mar 23, 2021
FrenzyCap score—18
1-month return−0.8%+1.6%
3-month return+0.1%−0.1%
Year to date+7.2%+5.8%
1-year return+8.3%+5.3%
30-day volatility9.4%7.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.3%−5.9%
Trailing 12-month yield1.44%1.85%
Holdings—7
Top 10 weight—100.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$6.4M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026third-party data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BAMA holdings · MPRO holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.