BAMU vs MINT

Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF against PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
0.3 pts
MINT is ahead
Larger fund
MINT
$18.9B

Side by side

BAMUMINT
FundBrookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETFPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
IssuerBrookstonePIMCO
CategoryUltra-Short BondUltra-Short Bond
Expense ratio—0.36%
Assets—$18.9B
Average daily dollar volume$207K$231M
ListedSep 26, 2023Nov 16, 2009
FrenzyCap score—79
1-month return+0.2%−0.1%
3-month return−0.0%−0.2%
Year to date+0.5%+0.2%
1-year return−0.2%+0.1%
30-day volatility0.4%1.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−0.5%
Trailing 12-month yield2.91%4.09%
Holdings—1,082
Top 10 weight—9.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$430M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—3.3%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 16, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BAMU holdings · MINT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.