BAMY vs BINC

Brookstone Yield ETF against iShares Flexible Income Active ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
0.1 pts
BAMY is ahead
Larger fund
BINC
$16.4B

Side by side

BAMYBINC
FundBrookstone Yield ETFiShares Flexible Income Active ETF
IssuerBrookstoneiShares
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio—0.40%
Assets$41M$16.4B
Average daily dollar volume$211K$134M
ListedSep 27, 2023May 19, 2023
FrenzyCap score1677
1-month return−1.3%−1.2%
3-month return−2.9%−2.5%
Year to date−4.2%−3.9%
1-year return−4.4%−4.5%
30-day volatility6.0%3.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.2%−5.5%
Trailing 12-month yield7.09%6.04%
Holdings—4,705
Top 10 weight—21.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—−$664M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BAMY holdings · BINC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.