BBJP vs CAF

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF against MORGAN STANLEY CHINA A SHARE FUND, INC: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
8.7 pts
BBJP is ahead
Larger fund
BBJP
$19.2B

Side by side

BBJPCAF
FundJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETFMORGAN STANLEY CHINA A SHARE FUND, INC
IssuerJPMorganMorgan Stanley
CategorySingle CountrySingle Country
Expense ratio0.19%—
Assets$19.2B$286M
Average daily dollar volume$86M$198K
ListedJun 15, 2018Sep 28, 2006
FrenzyCap score9230
1-month return−2.9%−10.8%
3-month return+5.0%−16.4%
Year to date+17.3%−3.2%
1-year return+12.1%+3.4%
30-day volatility16.2%21.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−13.6%−22.1%
Trailing 12-month yield4.58%—
Holdings179—
Top 10 weight28.9%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$988M thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility22.5%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BBJP holdings · CAF holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.