BCPL vs BINC

BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF against iShares Flexible Income Active ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
0 bp
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BINC
$16.4B

Side by side

BCPLBINC
FundBNY Mellon Core Plus ETFiShares Flexible Income Active ETF
IssuerBNY MelloniShares
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.40%0.40%
Assets$301M$16.4B
Average daily dollar volume$2.1M$134M
ListedMar 2, 2012May 19, 2023
FrenzyCap score5477
1-month return−1.9%−1.2%
3-month return−3.6%−2.5%
Year to date—−3.9%
1-year return—−4.5%
30-day volatility6.6%3.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.1%−5.5%
Trailing 12-month yield3.26%6.04%
Holdings3254,705
Top 10 weight20.2%21.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$58M thru May 2026−$664M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 29, 2026SEC filingas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BCPL holdings · BINC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.