BCPL vs BOND

BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF against PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
14 bp
BCPL is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BOND
$8.5B

Side by side

BCPLBOND
FundBNY Mellon Core Plus ETFPIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund
IssuerBNY MellonPIMCO
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.40%0.54%
Assets$301M$8.5B
Average daily dollar volume$2.1M$90M
ListedMar 2, 2012Feb 29, 2012
FrenzyCap score5471
1-month return−1.9%−2.3%
3-month return−3.6%−4.4%
Year to date—−6.6%
1-year return—−6.7%
30-day volatility6.6%5.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.1%−8.7%
Trailing 12-month yield3.26%5.46%
Holdings3252,012
Top 10 weight20.2%30.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$58M thru May 2026+$584M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—6.1%
Holdings as ofas of May 29, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BCPL holdings · BOND holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.