BDBT vs MAMB

Bluemonte Core Bond ETF against Monarch Ambassador Income Index ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
28%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
92 bp
BDBT is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.1 pts
MAMB is ahead
Larger fund
BDBT
$448M

Side by side

BDBTMAMB
FundBluemonte Core Bond ETFMonarch Ambassador Income Index ETF
IssuerBluemonteMonarch
CategoryCore BondAllocation
Expense ratio0.23%1.15%
Assets$448M$194M
Average daily dollar volume$1.6M$926K
ListedJun 20, 2025Mar 23, 2021
FrenzyCap score4026
1-month return−1.1%−2.0%
3-month return−2.9%−2.4%
Year to date−4.8%−3.3%
1-year return−5.4%−3.3%
30-day volatility4.8%7.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.7%−7.4%
Trailing 12-month yield4.08%2.80%
Holdings610
Top 10 weight99.9%99.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$41M thru Jul 2026+$17M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

55% of BDBT · 31% of MAMB
HoldingBDBTMAMB
MBB15.12%18.74%
AGG40.00%12.48%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BDBT holdings · MAMB holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.