BDBT vs TFFI

Bluemonte Core Bond ETF against Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
9%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
78 bp
BDBT is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BDBT
$448M

Side by side

BDBTTFFI
FundBluemonte Core Bond ETFChesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF
IssuerBluemonteChesapeake
CategoryCore BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.23%1.01%
Assets$448M$37M
Average daily dollar volume$1.6M$314K
ListedJun 20, 2025Feb 23, 2026
FrenzyCap score409
1-month return−1.1%−0.3%
3-month return−2.9%+7.0%
Year to date−4.8%—
1-year return−5.4%—
30-day volatility4.8%13.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.7%−4.2%
Trailing 12-month yield4.08%—
Holdings648
Top 10 weight99.9%58.7%
Look-through P/E—124.6
Holdings vs fair value—+20.8%
Holdings above 200-day average—0%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$41M thru Jul 2026+$18M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

20% of BDBT · 13% of TFFI
HoldingBDBTTFFI
VCSH5.04%9.06%
MBB15.12%4.43%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBDBTTFFIGap
Real Estate0.0%1.3%−1.3%

More: full overlap table · BDBT holdings · TFFI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.