BGB vs IBDS
Blackstone Strategic Credit 2027 Term Fund against iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
5.1 pts
IBDS is ahead
Larger fund
IBDS
$4.0B
Side by side
| BGB | IBDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Blackstone Strategic Credit 2027 Term Fund | iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF |
| Issuer | Blackstone | iShares |
| Category | Target Maturity | Target Maturity |
| Expense ratio | — | 0.10% |
| Assets | $493M | $4.0B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $2.1M | $20M |
| Listed | Sep 26, 2012 | Sep 12, 2017 |
| FrenzyCap score | 52 | 86 |
| 1-month return | −2.6% | −0.0% |
| 3-month return | −2.3% | −0.2% |
| Year to date | −6.4% | −0.7% |
| 1-year return | −6.0% | −0.9% |
| 30-day volatility | 9.1% | 1.1% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −8.5% | −1.3% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | 4.28% |
| Holdings | — | 649 |
| Top 10 weight | — | 6.0% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | — | +$78M thru Jul 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · BGB holdings · IBDS holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.