BILZ vs PULS

PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active ETF against PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
1 bp
BILZ is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.2 pts
BILZ is ahead
Larger fund
PULS
$19.7B

Side by side

BILZPULS
FundPIMCO Ultra Short Government Active ETFPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
IssuerPIMCOPGIM
CategoryUltra-Short BondUltra-Short Bond
Expense ratio0.14%0.15%
Assets$974M$19.7B
Average daily dollar volume$19M$179M
ListedJun 21, 2023Apr 5, 2018
FrenzyCap score6090
1-month return+0.0%−0.1%
3-month return−0.0%−0.1%
Year to date+0.1%−0.0%
1-year return−0.2%−0.4%
30-day volatility0.9%1.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−0.5%−0.7%
Trailing 12-month yield3.81%4.38%
Holdings5730
Top 10 weight100.0%6.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$105M thru Jun 2026+$2.1B thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—16.2%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of May 29, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BILZ · 0% of PULS

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BILZ holdings · PULS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.