BINC vs BNDD

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF against Quadratic Deflation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
62 bp
BINC is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.2 pts
BINC is ahead
Larger fund
BINC
$16.4B

Side by side

BINCBNDD
FundiShares Flexible Income Active ETFQuadratic Deflation ETF
IssueriSharesQuadratic
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.40%1.02%
Assets$16.4B$13M
Average daily dollar volume$134M$72K
ListedMay 19, 2023Sep 16, 2021
FrenzyCap score772
1-month return−1.2%−1.1%
3-month return−2.5%−3.4%
Year to date−3.9%−0.7%
1-year return−4.5%−4.7%
30-day volatility3.5%8.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.5%−8.2%
Trailing 12-month yield6.04%3.72%
Holdings4,7054
Top 10 weight21.0%79.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$664M thru Jul 2026+$34M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—19.6%
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BINC · 0% of BNDD

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBINCBNDDGap
Technology0.0%0.0%+0.0%

More: full overlap table · BINC holdings · BNDD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.