BINC vs CAS

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF against Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
33.3 pts
BINC is ahead
Larger fund
BINC
$16.6B

Side by side

BINCCAS
FundiShares Flexible Income Active ETFSimplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF
IssueriSharesSimplify
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.40%—
Assets$16.6B—
Average daily dollar volume$143M$75K
ListedMay 19, 2023Jan 13, 2025
FrenzyCap score77—
1-month return−0.9%−16.8%
3-month return−2.1%−13.9%
Year to date−3.9%−14.7%
1-year return−5.0%−38.3%
30-day volatility2.7%26.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.5%−42.4%
Trailing 12-month yield6.03%66.99%
Holdings4,814—
Top 10 weight19.9%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$664M thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BINC holdings · CAS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.