BINC vs PYLD

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF against PIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
0.6 pts
BINC is ahead
Larger fund
BINC
$16.4B

Side by side

BINCPYLD
FundiShares Flexible Income Active ETFPIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF
IssueriSharesPIMCO
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.40%—
Assets$16.4B$15.9B
Average daily dollar volume$134M$156M
ListedMay 19, 2023Jun 21, 2023
FrenzyCap score77100
1-month return−1.2%−1.6%
3-month return−2.5%−3.2%
Year to date−3.9%−4.8%
1-year return−4.5%−5.1%
30-day volatility3.5%5.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.5%−6.7%
Trailing 12-month yield6.04%6.60%
Holdings4,705—
Top 10 weight21.0%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$664M thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BINC holdings · PYLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.