BINC vs RCS

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF against PIMCO STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
26.3 pts
BINC is ahead
Larger fund
BINC
$16.5B

Side by side

BINCRCS
FundiShares Flexible Income Active ETFPIMCO STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.
IssueriSharesPIMCO
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.40%—
Assets$16.5B$231M
Average daily dollar volume$142M$866K
ListedMay 19, 2023Mar 18, 1994
FrenzyCap score7740
1-month return−1.4%−1.4%
3-month return−2.3%−5.2%
Year to date−3.9%−12.2%
1-year return−4.9%−31.2%
30-day volatility2.9%15.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.5%−32.4%
Trailing 12-month yield6.04%—
Holdings4,909—
Top 10 weight20.1%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$664M thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BINC holdings · RCS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.