BINC vs RFCI

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF against ALPS Dynamic Core Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
11 bp
BINC is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.3 pts
BINC is ahead
Larger fund
BINC
$16.4B

Side by side

BINCRFCI
FundiShares Flexible Income Active ETFALPS Dynamic Core Income ETF
IssueriSharesALPS
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.40%0.51%
Assets$16.4B$13M
Average daily dollar volume$134M$216K
ListedMay 19, 2023Jun 10, 2016
FrenzyCap score7722
1-month return−1.2%−1.3%
3-month return−2.5%−2.9%
Year to date−3.9%−5.3%
1-year return−4.5%−5.8%
30-day volatility3.5%4.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.5%−7.4%
Trailing 12-month yield6.04%4.74%
Holdings4,70546
Top 10 weight21.0%44.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$664M thru Jul 2026$0 thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BINC holdings · RFCI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.