BINC vs RSBY

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF against Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
61 bp
BINC is cheaper
1-year return gap
14.3 pts
RSBY is ahead
Larger fund
BINC
$16.5B

Side by side

BINCRSBY
FundiShares Flexible Income Active ETFReturn Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
IssueriSharesReturn Stacked
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.40%1.01%
Assets$16.5B$60M
Average daily dollar volume$142M$347K
ListedMay 19, 2023Aug 20, 2024
FrenzyCap score7710
1-month return−1.4%+0.8%
3-month return−2.3%−0.2%
Year to date−3.9%+18.1%
1-year return−4.9%+9.4%
30-day volatility2.9%10.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.5%−8.7%
Trailing 12-month yield6.04%1.75%
Holdings4,90934
Top 10 weight20.1%77.1%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$664M thru Jul 2026−$14M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BINC · 0% of RSBY

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBINCRSBYGap
Technology0.0%0.0%+0.0%
Industrials0.0%0.0%+0.0%

More: full overlap table · BINC holdings · RSBY holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.