BINC vs TMSF

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF against T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
3 bp
TMSF is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BINC
$16.4B

Side by side

BINCTMSF
FundiShares Flexible Income Active ETFT. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF
IssueriSharesT. Rowe Price
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.40%0.37%
Assets$16.4B$29M
Average daily dollar volume$134M$116K
ListedMay 19, 2023Nov 19, 2025
FrenzyCap score7736
1-month return−1.2%−1.9%
3-month return−2.5%−2.5%
Year to date−3.9%−3.1%
1-year return−4.5%—
30-day volatility3.5%3.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.5%−4.2%
Trailing 12-month yield6.04%4.77%
Holdings4,705309
Top 10 weight21.0%16.4%
Look-through P/E—15.9
Holdings vs fair value—+43.5%
Holdings above 200-day average—0%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$664M thru Jul 2026−$1.2M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BINC · 0% of TMSF

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBINCTMSFGap
Technology0.0%0.0%+0.0%

More: full overlap table · BINC holdings · TMSF holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.