BINT vs URTH

Bluemonte Global Equity ETF against iShares MSCI World ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
1 bp
BINT is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.3 pts
BINT is ahead
Larger fund
URTH
$8.9B

Side by side

BINTURTH
FundBluemonte Global Equity ETFiShares MSCI World ETF
IssuerBluemonteiShares
CategoryGlobalGlobal
Expense ratio0.23%0.24%
Assets$411M$8.9B
Average daily dollar volume$1.5M$129M
ListedJun 20, 2025Jan 10, 2012
FrenzyCap score4993
1-month return−3.4%−0.7%
3-month return+1.5%+3.9%
Year to date+13.1%+12.2%
1-year return+15.1%+13.8%
30-day volatility13.1%10.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−11.0%−9.1%
Trailing 12-month yield1.50%1.36%
Holdings41,274
Top 10 weight99.3%27.4%
Look-through P/E—26.3
Holdings vs fair value—+1.5%
Holdings above 200-day average—70%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$59M thru Jul 2026+$551M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—13.5%
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BINT · 0% of URTH

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBINTURTHGap
Technology0.0%34.4%−34.4%
Industrials0.0%8.9%−8.9%
Financials0.0%8.2%−8.2%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%7.7%−7.7%
Health Care0.0%7.0%−7.0%
Energy0.0%3.3%−3.3%
Consumer Staples0.0%2.5%−2.5%
Materials0.0%2.2%−2.2%
Utilities0.0%2.1%−2.1%
Real Estate0.0%1.3%−1.3%
Communication Services0.0%1.2%−1.2%

More: full overlap table · BINT holdings · URTH holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.