BIOY vs QQQI
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Biotech ETF against NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
39 bp
QQQI is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
QQQI
$15.1B
Side by side
| BIOY | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | GraniteShares YieldBOOST Biotech ETF | NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF |
| Issuer | GraniteShares | NEOS |
| Category | Covered Call | Covered Call |
| Expense ratio | 1.07% | 0.68% |
| Assets | $693K | $15.1B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $46K | $219M |
| Listed | May 4, 2026 | Jan 29, 2024 |
| FrenzyCap score | 5 | 81 |
| 1-month return | −2.9% | +4.0% |
| 3-month return | −9.8% | +1.6% |
| Year to date | — | +4.5% |
| 1-year return | — | +2.4% |
| 30-day volatility | 18.7% | 12.0% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −21.1% | −13.7% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 29.11% | 13.58% |
| Holdings | 3 | 105 |
| Top 10 weight | 58.6% | 45.1% |
| Look-through P/E | — | 34.5 |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | −3.8% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | 77% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$750K thru Jun 2026 | +$2.4B thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | 13.2% |
| Holdings as of | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · BIOY holdings · QQQI holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.