BKCH vs MNVT

Global X Blockchain ETF against Moonvest ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
8%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
25 bp
BKCH is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BKCH
$270M

Side by side

BKCHMNVT
FundGlobal X Blockchain ETFMoonvest ETF
IssuerGlobal XMoonvest
CategoryFintech & BlockchainSmall Cap Blend
Expense ratio0.50%0.75%
Assets$270M$69M
Average daily dollar volume$3.4M$628K
ListedJul 12, 2021Mar 17, 2026
FrenzyCap score5025
1-month return−8.7%−6.2%
3-month return−3.2%−2.5%
Year to date+1.2%—
1-year return−38.5%—
30-day volatility63.9%26.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−57.1%−24.4%
Trailing 12-month yield1.89%—
Holdings3522
Top 10 weight69.4%54.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value+12.9%+41.6%
Holdings above 200-day average13%13%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$36M thru May 2026+$26M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility70.9%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

14% of BKCH · 13% of MNVT
HoldingBKCHMNVT
BMNR10.54%4.64%
CLSK3.45%8.04%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBKCHMNVTGap
Financials85.5%12.7%+72.8%
Technology3.9%25.6%−21.7%
Industrials0.0%17.4%−17.4%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%10.4%−10.4%
Health Care0.0%9.4%−9.4%
Consumer Staples0.0%3.8%−3.8%

More: full overlap table · BKCH holdings · MNVT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.