BKLN vs CLOC

Invesco Senior Loan ETF against AAM Crescent CLO ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
47 bp
CLOC is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BKLN
$6.2B

Side by side

BKLNCLOC
FundInvesco Senior Loan ETFAAM Crescent CLO ETF
IssuerInvescoAAM
CategoryBank Loans & CLOsBank Loans & CLOs
Expense ratio0.65%0.18%
Assets$6.2B$61M
Average daily dollar volume$250M$136K
ListedMar 3, 2011Oct 22, 2025
FrenzyCap score6943
1-month return−1.2%−0.1%
3-month return−0.2%+0.0%
Year to date−3.2%−0.1%
1-year return−2.2%—
30-day volatility3.0%2.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.0%−1.7%
Trailing 12-month yield6.43%5.74%
Holdings16861
Top 10 weight15.2%24.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$733M thru May 2026+$7.5M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility11.2%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BKLN · 0% of CLOC

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BKLN holdings · CLOC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.