BLGR vs IWF

Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF against iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
6 bp
IWF is cheaper
1-year return gap
8.6 pts
BLGR is ahead
Larger fund
IWF
$126.1B

Side by side

BLGRIWF
FundBluemonte Large Cap Growth ETFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
IssuerBluemonteiShares
CategoryLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
Expense ratio0.24%0.18%
Assets$277M$126.1B
Average daily dollar volume$1.0M$559M
ListedJun 20, 2025May 22, 2000
FrenzyCap score4080
1-month return−1.6%−2.5%
3-month return+5.7%+4.2%
Year to date+11.7%+4.4%
1-year return+13.1%+4.5%
30-day volatility14.5%16.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−14.2%−16.4%
Trailing 12-month yield0.26%0.87%
Holdings4376
Top 10 weight99.2%57.7%
Look-through P/E—30.8
Holdings vs fair value—−1.8%
Holdings above 200-day average—64%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$25M thru Jul 2026−$1.3B thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—20.4%
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BLGR · 0% of IWF

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBLGRIWFGap
Technology0.0%69.2%−69.2%
Industrials0.0%11.5%−11.5%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%7.9%−7.9%
Health Care0.0%6.0%−6.0%
Financials0.0%1.4%−1.4%
Communication Services0.0%1.2%−1.2%
Materials0.0%1.0%−1.0%
Utilities0.0%0.5%−0.5%
Consumer Staples0.0%0.5%−0.5%
Real Estate0.0%0.4%−0.4%
Energy0.0%0.3%−0.3%
Other0.0%0.0%−0.0%

More: full overlap table · BLGR holdings · IWF holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.