BLST vs DFSD

Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF against Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
7 bp
DFSD is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.1 pts
BLST is ahead
Larger fund
DFSD
$7.3B

Side by side

BLSTDFSD
FundBluemonte Short Term Bond ETFDimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF
IssuerBluemonteDimensional
CategoryShort-Term BondShort-Term Bond
Expense ratio0.23%0.16%
Assets$167M$7.3B
Average daily dollar volume$478K$35M
ListedJun 20, 2025Nov 15, 2021
FrenzyCap score3284
1-month return−0.5%−0.4%
3-month return−1.4%−1.3%
Year to date−3.0%−2.9%
1-year return−3.9%−4.0%
30-day volatility3.4%2.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.6%−4.2%
Trailing 12-month yield3.89%4.54%
Holdings31,598
Top 10 weight99.6%8.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$13M thru Jul 2026+$625M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BLST · 0% of DFSD

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BLST holdings · DFSD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.