BLUX vs FNDX

Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF against Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
0 bp
same fee
1-year return gap
9.4 pts
FNDX is ahead
Larger fund
FNDX
$28.3B

Side by side

BLUXFNDX
FundBluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETFSchwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
IssuerBluemonteSchwab
CategoryMulti-FactorMulti-Factor
Expense ratio0.25%0.25%
Assets$571M$28.3B
Average daily dollar volume$1.7M$116M
ListedJun 20, 2025Aug 15, 2013
FrenzyCap score4690
1-month return−1.7%+1.6%
3-month return+0.2%+4.3%
Year to date+12.9%+20.2%
1-year return+14.0%+23.5%
30-day volatility10.8%8.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−9.2%−6.4%
Trailing 12-month yield0.99%1.44%
Holdings4734
Top 10 weight99.8%22.3%
Look-through P/E—22.8
Holdings vs fair value—+9.7%
Holdings above 200-day average—66%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$46M thru Jul 2026−$644M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—21.4%
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 7, 2026third-party data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BLUX · 0% of FNDX

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBLUXFNDXGap
Technology0.0%24.5%−24.5%
Financials0.0%13.1%−13.1%
Health Care0.0%11.8%−11.8%
Industrials0.0%11.8%−11.8%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%10.4%−10.4%
Energy0.0%9.2%−9.2%
Consumer Staples0.0%5.8%−5.8%
Utilities0.0%3.9%−3.9%
Materials0.0%3.8%−3.8%
Communication Services0.0%3.4%−3.4%
Real Estate0.0%1.7%−1.7%
Other0.0%0.1%−0.1%

More: full overlap table · BLUX holdings · FNDX holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.