BNDD vs PYLD

Quadratic Deflation ETF against PIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
0.4 pts
BNDD is ahead
Larger fund
PYLD
$15.9B

Side by side

BNDDPYLD
FundQuadratic Deflation ETFPIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF
IssuerQuadraticPIMCO
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio1.02%—
Assets$13M$15.9B
Average daily dollar volume$72K$156M
ListedSep 16, 2021Jun 21, 2023
FrenzyCap score2100
1-month return−1.1%−1.6%
3-month return−3.4%−3.2%
Year to date−0.7%−4.8%
1-year return−4.7%−5.1%
30-day volatility8.4%5.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.2%−6.7%
Trailing 12-month yield3.72%6.60%
Holdings4—
Top 10 weight79.6%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$34M thru Jun 2026—
30-day implied volatility19.6%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BNDD holdings · PYLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.