BNDW vs DFGP

Vanguard Total World Bond ETF against Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
17 bp
BNDW is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.5 pts
BNDW is ahead
Larger fund
DFGP
$3.7B

Side by side

BNDWDFGP
FundVanguard Total World Bond ETFDimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF
IssuerVanguardDimensional
CategoryInternational BondInternational Bond
Expense ratio0.05%0.22%
Assets$1.9B$3.7B
Average daily dollar volume$8.2M$19M
ListedSep 4, 2018Nov 7, 2023
FrenzyCap score6578
1-month return−0.6%−1.3%
3-month return−1.9%−2.3%
Year to date−3.5%−3.6%
1-year return−5.5%−7.0%
30-day volatility4.3%5.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.6%−7.5%
Trailing 12-month yield4.40%6.17%
Holdings41,672
Top 10 weight100.0%14.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$315M thru May 2026+$1.0B thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility14.5%—
Holdings as ofas of Sep 30, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 19, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BNDW · 0% of DFGP

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BNDW holdings · DFGP holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.