BOND vs DWWN
PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund against Principal Long Duration ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
35 bp
DWWN is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BOND
$8.5B
Side by side
| BOND | DWWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund | Principal Long Duration ETF |
| Issuer | PIMCO | Principal |
| Category | Multisector Bond | Multisector Bond |
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.19% |
| Assets | $8.5B | $12M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $90M | $2K |
| Listed | Feb 29, 2012 | May 21, 2026 |
| FrenzyCap score | 71 | 38 |
| 1-month return | −2.3% | −5.4% |
| 3-month return | −4.4% | −10.9% |
| Year to date | −6.6% | — |
| 1-year return | −6.7% | — |
| 30-day volatility | 5.8% | 15.1% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −8.7% | −18.2% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 5.46% | 2.00% |
| Holdings | 2,012 | 58 |
| Top 10 weight | 30.5% | 30.6% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$584M thru Jun 2026 | +$11M thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | 6.1% | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · BOND holdings · DWWN holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.