BOND vs GRN

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund against iPath Series B Carbon Exchange-Traded Notes: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
18.5 pts
GRN is ahead
Larger fund
BOND
$8.5B

Side by side

BONDGRN
FundPIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded FundiPath Series B Carbon Exchange-Traded Notes
IssuerPIMCOiPath
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.54%—
Assets$8.5B—
Average daily dollar volume$90M$20K
ListedFeb 29, 2012Sep 10, 2019
FrenzyCap score71—
1-month return−2.3%+1.6%
3-month return−4.4%+9.3%
Year to date−6.6%+2.0%
1-year return−6.7%+11.8%
30-day volatility5.8%21.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.7%−30.4%
Trailing 12-month yield5.46%—
Holdings2,012—
Top 10 weight30.5%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$584M thru Jun 2026—
30-day implied volatility6.1%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BOND holdings · GRN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.