BOND vs RSBY

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund against Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
47 bp
BOND is cheaper
1-year return gap
16.2 pts
RSBY is ahead
Larger fund
BOND
$8.6B

Side by side

BONDRSBY
FundPIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded FundReturn Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
IssuerPIMCOReturn Stacked
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.54%1.01%
Assets$8.6B$60M
Average daily dollar volume$97M$347K
ListedFeb 29, 2012Aug 20, 2024
FrenzyCap score6710
1-month return−1.4%+0.8%
3-month return−2.9%−0.2%
Year to date−5.7%+18.1%
1-year return−6.8%+9.4%
30-day volatility6.0%10.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.7%−8.7%
Trailing 12-month yield5.41%1.75%
Holdings1,60934
Top 10 weight38.7%77.1%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$584M thru Jun 2026−$14M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility6.1%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BOND · 0% of RSBY

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BOND holdings · RSBY holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.