BOND vs TSI

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund against TCW Strategic Income Fund, Inc.: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
8.6 pts
BOND is ahead
Larger fund
BOND
$8.6B

Side by side

BONDTSI
FundPIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded FundTCW Strategic Income Fund, Inc.
IssuerPIMCOTCW
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.54%—
Assets$8.6B$267M
Average daily dollar volume$97M$751K
ListedFeb 29, 2012Feb 26, 1987
FrenzyCap score6740
1-month return−1.4%−2.6%
3-month return−2.9%−4.6%
Year to date−5.7%−15.2%
1-year return−6.8%−15.3%
30-day volatility6.0%12.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.7%−16.5%
Trailing 12-month yield5.41%—
Holdings1,609—
Top 10 weight38.7%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$584M thru Jun 2026—
30-day implied volatility6.1%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BOND holdings · TSI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.