BOND vs ZHOG

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund against F/m Opportunistic Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
11 bp
ZHOG is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BOND
$8.6B

Side by side

BONDZHOG
FundPIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded FundF/m Opportunistic Income ETF
IssuerPIMCOF/m Investments
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.54%0.43%
Assets$8.6B$46M
Average daily dollar volume$97M$115K
ListedFeb 29, 2012Sep 5, 2023
FrenzyCap score6728
1-month return−1.4%−0.9%
3-month return−2.9%−1.9%
Year to date−5.7%—
1-year return−6.8%—
30-day volatility6.0%3.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.7%−4.5%
Trailing 12-month yield5.41%3.87%
Holdings1,60964
Top 10 weight38.7%37.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$584M thru Jun 2026−$511K thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility6.1%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BOND · 3% of ZHOG
HoldingBONDZHOG
RD MICHIGAN PROP OWNER I SR SEC 144A, due Mar 30, 20450.29%0.99%
ANTARES HOLDINGS SR UNSEC 144A, due Oct 23, 20290.07%2.30%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BOND holdings · ZHOG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.