BTX vs CEFS

BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust against Saba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
25.3 pts
BTX is ahead
Larger fund
CEFS
$429M

Side by side

BTXCEFS
FundBlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term TrustSaba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF
IssueriSharesSaba
CategoryMulti-StrategyMulti-Strategy
Expense ratio—2.61%
Assets—$429M
Average daily dollar volume$4.3M$2.2M
ListedMar 26, 2021Mar 20, 2017
FrenzyCap score—36
1-month return−3.5%−2.9%
3-month return+4.7%−3.2%
Year to date+32.5%+5.5%
1-year return+32.1%+6.8%
30-day volatility25.7%13.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−18.6%−7.4%
Trailing 12-month yield—7.87%
Holdings—74
Top 10 weight—50.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$2.8M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BTX holdings · CEFS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.