BUFD vs KJUL

FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF against Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - July: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
16 bp
KJUL is cheaper
1-year return gap
5.5 pts
BUFD is ahead
Larger fund
BUFD
$2.2B

Side by side

BUFDKJUL
FundFT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETFInnovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - July
IssuerFT VestInnovator
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.79%
Assets$2.2B$225M
Average daily dollar volume$10M$561K
ListedJan 20, 2021Jun 30, 2020
FrenzyCap score4131
1-month return+0.4%−2.0%
3-month return+3.1%−2.1%
Year to date+8.5%+3.5%
1-year return+10.4%+4.9%
30-day volatility4.0%8.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−3.4%−5.8%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings136
Top 10 weight83.3%103.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$96M thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BUFD holdings · KJUL holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.