BUFD vs MMAR

FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF against Pacer Swan SOS Moderate March ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
46 bp
MMAR is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BUFD
$2.2B

Side by side

BUFDMMAR
FundFT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETFPacer Swan SOS Moderate March ETF
IssuerFT VestPacer
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.49%
Assets$2.2B$1.6M
Average daily dollar volume$9.3M$203
ListedJan 20, 2021Jun 11, 2026
FrenzyCap score4132
1-month return+1.4%+1.7%
3-month return+2.7%+2.8%
Year to date+8.4%—
1-year return+10.5%—
30-day volatility3.9%4.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−3.4%−1.3%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings135
Top 10 weight83.3%98.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$96M thru May 2026+$1.6M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BUFD holdings · MMAR holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.