BUFD vs NAUG

FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF against Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - August: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
16 bp
NAUG is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.3 pts
BUFD is ahead
Larger fund
BUFD
$2.2B

Side by side

BUFDNAUG
FundFT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETFInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - August
IssuerFT VestInnovator
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.79%
Assets$2.2B$63M
Average daily dollar volume$10M$274K
ListedJan 20, 2021Jul 31, 2024
FrenzyCap score4124
1-month return−2.1%−6.5%
3-month return−1.0%−3.8%
Year to date+6.0%+6.3%
1-year return+7.6%+7.3%
30-day volatility8.3%15.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−3.4%−7.8%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings136
Top 10 weight83.4%104.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$96M thru May 2026−$43M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Nov 6, 2026issuer dataas of Nov 6, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BUFD holdings · NAUG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.