BUFD vs QGRD

FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF against Horizon Nasdaq-100 Defined Risk ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
10 bp
QGRD is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.2 pts
QGRD is ahead
Larger fund
BUFD
$2.2B

Side by side

BUFDQGRD
FundFT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETFHorizon Nasdaq-100 Defined Risk ETF
IssuerFT VestHorizon
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.85%
Assets$2.2B$88M
Average daily dollar volume$9.3M$494K
ListedJan 20, 2021Jul 9, 2025
FrenzyCap score4117
1-month return+1.4%+4.4%
3-month return+2.7%+2.7%
Year to date+8.4%+14.1%
1-year return+10.5%+11.7%
30-day volatility3.9%10.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−3.4%−10.8%
Trailing 12-month yield—1.37%
Holdings139
Top 10 weight83.3%99.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$96M thru May 2026+$1.4M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BUFD holdings · QGRD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.