BUFD vs QMAR
FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF against FT Vest Growth-100 Buffer ETF - March: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
5 bp
QMAR is cheaper
1-year return gap
8.4 pts
QMAR is ahead
Larger fund
BUFD
$2.2B
Side by side
| BUFD | QMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF | FT Vest Growth-100 Buffer ETF - March |
| Issuer | FT Vest | FT Vest |
| Category | Buffer | Buffer |
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.90% |
| Assets | $2.2B | $616M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $10M | $266K |
| Listed | Jan 20, 2021 | Mar 19, 2021 |
| FrenzyCap score | 41 | 19 |
| 1-month return | +0.4% | −0.1% |
| 3-month return | +3.1% | +4.6% |
| Year to date | +8.5% | +16.4% |
| 1-year return | +10.4% | +18.8% |
| 30-day volatility | 4.0% | 5.5% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −3.4% | −3.2% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | — |
| Holdings | 13 | 5 |
| Top 10 weight | 83.3% | 108.4% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$96M thru May 2026 | +$33M thru May 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data | as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · BUFD holdings · QMAR holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.