BUFQ vs GMAR

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF against FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
15 bp
GMAR is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.8 pts
BUFQ is ahead
Larger fund
BUFQ
$1.7B

Side by side

BUFQGMAR
FundFT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETFFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March
IssuerFT VestFT Vest
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio1.00%0.85%
Assets$1.7B$425M
Average daily dollar volume$9.1M$3.4M
ListedJun 15, 2022Mar 17, 2023
FrenzyCap score3332
1-month return−0.9%+0.4%
3-month return+4.7%+2.9%
Year to date+12.4%+11.1%
1-year return+14.8%+13.0%
30-day volatility8.4%2.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.4%−1.8%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings55
Top 10 weight100.0%107.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$155M thru May 2026+$22M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BUFQ holdings · GMAR holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.