BUFQ vs OCDB
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF against Aptus October Deep Buffer ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
75 bp
OCDB is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BUFQ
$1.7B
Side by side
| BUFQ | OCDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF | Aptus October Deep Buffer ETF |
| Issuer | FT Vest | Aptus |
| Category | Buffer | Buffer |
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | 0.25% |
| Assets | $1.7B | $1.6M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $8.6M | $50K |
| Listed | Jun 15, 2022 | May 5, 2026 |
| FrenzyCap score | 33 | 35 |
| 1-month return | +3.4% | +2.4% |
| 3-month return | +5.2% | +3.8% |
| Year to date | +14.2% | — |
| 1-year return | +16.7% | — |
| 30-day volatility | 6.6% | 7.2% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −5.4% | −1.8% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | — |
| Holdings | 5 | 5 |
| Top 10 weight | 99.9% | 100.5% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$155M thru May 2026 | +$1.5M thru Jul 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of May 31, 2026SEC filing | as of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · BUFQ holdings · OCDB holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.