BUFQ vs OCTP

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF against PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
50 bp
OCTP is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.4 pts
BUFQ is ahead
Larger fund
BUFQ
$1.7B

Side by side

BUFQOCTP
FundFT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETFPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October
IssuerFT VestPGIM
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio1.00%0.50%
Assets$1.7B$28M
Average daily dollar volume$9.1M$689K
ListedJun 15, 2022May 16, 2024
FrenzyCap score3337
1-month return−0.9%+1.1%
3-month return+4.7%+4.6%
Year to date+12.4%+11.5%
1-year return+14.8%+13.4%
30-day volatility8.4%4.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.4%−5.2%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings517
Top 10 weight100.0%101.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$155M thru May 2026+$965K thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BUFQ holdings · OCTP holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.