BUFQ vs ONEZ

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF against TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
4 bp
ONEZ is cheaper
1-year return gap
9.3 pts
BUFQ is ahead
Larger fund
BUFQ
$1.7B

Side by side

BUFQONEZ
FundFT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETFTrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF
IssuerFT VestTrueShares
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio1.00%0.96%
Assets$1.7B$339M
Average daily dollar volume$9.1M$857K
ListedJun 15, 2022Jan 24, 2025
FrenzyCap score3325
1-month return−0.9%−0.5%
3-month return+4.7%+3.1%
Year to date+12.4%+8.4%
1-year return+14.8%+5.5%
30-day volatility8.4%7.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.4%−9.6%
Trailing 12-month yield—3.66%
Holdings515
Top 10 weight100.0%75.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$155M thru May 2026+$190M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BUFQ · 0% of ONEZ

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BUFQ holdings · ONEZ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.